eosceres art . artists for scott
SYMBOLOGY 101 According to Hal Jewett






home
artist bio
current work
humanity descending
experimental
photography
~ . contact . ~
favorite links









Prosecutorial Misconduct ...
  • Courtroom misconduct (making inappropriate or inflammatory comments in the presence of the jury; introducing or attempting to introduce inadmissible, inappropriate or inflammatory evidence; mischaracterizing the evidence or the facts of the case to the court or jury) ... Steve Weinberg & Center for Public Integrity

The prosecutor, Hal Jewett,  used what has appropriately been termed as "The Hate Strategy" to get Dyleski convicted (ironic, isn't it?) Or, as one forum poster put it...

"The mere fact with this new "HATE" strategy has been working well for prosecution for well over ten years. The idea is to overwhelm the public with information that would most likely illicit a moral outrage against the suspect. Then proceed to make the evidence fit once a suspect has been pinpointed or chosen. The only problem with this strategy is the real perpetrator(s) get away with a heinious crime and proceed to learn from their errors to go on and commit more crimes that will generate themselves great wealth. "


Scott Dyleski was severely demonized in the media for his Goth look and art as soon as he was arrested. The San Francisco Chronicle chose to put his name out immediately even though he was a juvenile AND they posted a picture of Scott in Goth look - the only really scary or possibly scary picture they  found of Scott. In the prelim hearing, Mr. Jewett coninutally tries to refer to a raincoat as a 'trench coat'. We all know what horrifc images come to mind about trench coats and teenage boys.

          8   Jewett:   Without looking at the bag, just kind of peeking,

          9   you're short, so you can't really see it, you actually are able  

         10   to reach in and pull a trench -- some kind of raincoat out?   (2.16.06)  


Sly, huh? The fact is, that Scott's mother found an old duffel bag in an abandoned van on the Curiel property where they lived.
Joe Lynch saw it also as he was with her clearing brush. The duffel bag that had only a coat in it at the time (two days after Vitale's murder). She told both Kim Curiel and Scott about it to see if anyone wanted it. Scott had an opportunity to take it out of the van, but didn't. Scott and everyone in the house knew at the time, that Esther had not made arrangements for disposal of the van. BTW, the coat was analyzed and had no DNA conencting Scott to the crime. Mysteriously, other items appeared in the bag by the time a volunteer deputy found it in the van after Scott's arrest: a shirt, a pair of pants, a ski mask, and one ladies evening glove. The shirt and pants had no DNA connection to the crime either. The glove had none of Scott's DNA in it, but did have someone else's along with Vitale's DNA. The ski mask supposedly had  been worn by Scott and was stored with camping equipment in a storage shed. It had Scott's DNA where you would expect it inside and small amout of Vitale's DNA on it outside. No advance testing was conducted on the glove nor is it clear that the DNA on the mask of Vitale's was not transfer DNA possibly from the glove.

Factual errors were promoted over-and-over in the media, but possibly the worst was that the "accused killer reportedly carved a Goth symbol on her body."

However, the Deputy District Prosecutor, Harold 'Hal' Jewett, proceeded in court to try and
relate these incisions/scratches to an unbelieveable number of things connected to Scott Dyleski  ...


1. ... to Scott's personal symbol -  the symbol for Pluto and an ancient star,....

Pluto   +   star  =    pluto and star - Scott Dyleski's symbol for himself



2. ... to a symbol in the liner notes of a Velvet Acid Christ CD set  - see this article. "Music to Kill For: Prosecutors in the Scott Dyleski trial evoke the specter of Marilyn Manson, er, make that Velvet Acid Christ". An excert from the article ...
"Velvet Acid Christ?" Jewett called to the audience as he raced back toward the witness box. "Yes," Moore replied.

Jewett asked Moore to open the box set, and when the deputy sheriff struggled with the contents -- which included a handheld light -- Jewett reached over like an anxious parent and pulled out the items himself. He referred Moore to the liner notes of the band's album, Hex Angel. "See any symbols there?" Jewett asked. "Down in the, let's see" -- he pondered the ceiling -- "in the bottom right-hand corner?"

"Yes, I do," Moore said."

"And what does it look like?"

Moore tried to explain. "It's like, like ..."

....Moore made motions with his hands to describe the mark. "It's like a T, but with a curve at the top."
cross of lorraine

I'm not sure which symbol or thing in Scott's room this "
It's like a T, but with a curve at the top" is supposed to actually relate to? It sound more like Scott's personal symbol...however...

... In testifying, Deputy Sheriff Moore had also stated that the mark looked like "a double-topped 'T'" which I guess is implying the Cross of Lorraine? From Wikipedia, "In 20th century use it is displayed as "graded", where the lower bar is longer than the upper, thus resembling a patriarchal cross, the crossbars of which, however, are both near the top (LINK)."
"I am pro animal, pro female rights, anti gun, anti war, anti murder, left, don't believe in greed and capitalism. Wish to see a brighter future for nature and the human race (Statement by the leader of the band Velvet Acid Christ, Bryan Erickson)."
Separation of Church and Hate bumper sticker
It comes as no surprise that this very statement could be one Scott Dyleski wrote about himself. The mark on Vitale's back was also related ...

3. ... to the 'H' in a bumper sticker that read "
I'm for the Separation of Church and Hate" --->
Oh my, that's super evil now isn't it? And, grasping on Jewett's part as why would someone pick out one letter in a bumper sticker?

4. ...  :( Below, is the visual from court, why did Jewett draw the picture on the left himself? Wouldn't you expect something more scientific such as a diagram precisely made from the actual wounds?


Hal Jewett referred to the mark this way in court, "Investigators found a symbol etched into Vitale's back."

The coroner's autopsy report describes the marks on Vitale's back as ...

* an "H-shaped figure cut into skin of posterior torso"

* as "3 intersecting superficial incisions...forming an H-shaped pattern with extension" (wiki)

In trial testimony, the Coroner, Dr. Brian Peterson, said, "On the back, there was another type of sharp-force injury what I described this as was a series of three intersecting superficial incisions."

VISUALS
used by Prosecutor Harold 'Hal' Jewett
during Scott Dyleski's trial.

Hal Jewett's screwy comparions Dyleski case


Jewett claimed the superficial incisions roughly look like the shape on the RIGHT
(unfortunately, the shape is even upside down, let alone distorted from the shape drawn in the coroner's autopsy - see below).


~ Jewett claimed the drawing on the left is Dyleski's signature
~ Jewett claimed the shape on the right is a symbol Dyleski carved into Pamela Vitale's back with a knife.
~ Jewett claimed the shape on the right looks like the symbol on the left, it just was not finished.


Pamela Vitale coroner's autopsy diagram
This is the actual picture drawn on the autopsy diagrams.
T
he superficial incisions as reported in the coroner's autopsy.
LINK TO AUTOPSY  (will correct link soon, sorry it is not longer active)


Pamela Vitale Crime scene diagram
Diagram of Crime Scene Shown by Hal Jewett showing placement of Pamela Vitale's body


**** Now, look at the autopsy diagram. You have to actually rotate it clockwise to fit on the diagram showing how Vitale's body was shown. Interesting that then the extention on the 'H' ends up  being on the left. Jewtt doesn't provide a reference in his diagram, but  you can directly place it over the diagram showing how Vitale's body was found as is.


Another exercise: try overlaying the coroner's drawing on Dyleski's personal symbol.


Are you still following?
It appears the prosecution was grasping at straws in trying to relate the superficial etching on Vitale's back to at least three or four symbols, none of which really even resemble each other.

It's interesting that none of the media coverage of this trial even questioned the viablility of this 'evidence'.

If this was a deliberate mark made on Vitale's back and is an 'H' does anyone think it is just too much coincidence that Horowitz starts with an 'H'.



This is really Scott's symbol, compare it again to the mark
(which Jewett conveniently drew thicker and in RED, oh my, or even compare the coroner's drawing to the little man Dyleski drew - is there really much similarity?).

Scott Dyleski's symbol Neptune Star

OR, compare the Lorraine Cross to the diagram he drew in red of the marks, OR compare the 'H' in the bumper sticker, OR....


To further demonize Dyleski, the press and the prosecutor invoked the EVIL meme about things Dyleski had said or done, especially his conversation with his friends the night of Vitale's murder. Not only did they claim his symbol was connected to the carvings on Vitale's back, but also that his conversation that night somehow showed he was connected to the number of bludgeonings that Vitale had and that his conversation showed he was possibly reveling in some Lizzie Borden metaphor.

Jewett then asked Robin Croen if Dyleski used any symbol on his writings or art work to identify himself.  Robin Croen answered that he only knew the general shape of such a symbol, not the precise one.  At Jewett’s request he drew what he recalled the symbol to look like.  It was one central vertical line, with one horizontal line crossing it one third of the way up, then another horizontal line above that one.  This horizontal line had a vertical line at each end of that line pointing upwards.  At the top of the central vertical line was a complete circle ...

Jewett is intent on proving that the symbol on the deceased’s back was in fact, Dyleski’s “calling card” or personal symbol. However, the drawing by Robin Croen was distinctively different from that found on the deceased ...

Croen testified that on Saturday night, Dyleski and his girlfriend met with Robin Croen and their friend Oscar [refers to Oscar Cummins-Timms].  Robin Croen gave Dyleski marijuana.  Oscar asked Dyleski about female serial killers, including Lizzie Borden who had been accused, but found innocent, of killing her father and step mother.  Oscar also discussed a book dealing with the psychology of murder. Oscar asked Dyleski about mass murderers. However, Croen could not recall what specific answers Dyleski gave (link).

It's truly unfortunate that a number of writers, police officials, prosecutors and so on continue to use unfounded scare tactics when talking about crimes or in court cases. This does not mean there are not killers who are in a weird cult who could initiate such cruelty on another or that someone who dressed Gothlike hasn't commited a murder, however, it is an injustice to the public and to those accused to go far beyond the boundaries of what is known about such murders and about that person. Jewett and the press promoted hate and fear toward Scott Dyleki. That was further promoted by many authors looking to validate their own agenda by weaving cases such as Scott's in with poor research and misinformation (see Recent anti-Satanist scaremongers: Jim Kouri, by Diane Vera).

What's so disconcerting about this is that Kouri .was  "the fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police" and that he chose to put out such information related to Dyleski being a Satanist on Oct 22, 2005, only two days after Dyleski was arrested (link). He states, "The 16-year old suspect is reported to have been involved in some kind of self-styled Satanism including the reading the Anton LeVay's Satanic Bible and use of occult symbols at the crime scene." So he doesn't mind using a 16 year old as a patsy in order to promte his agenda. Very sad. Interesting also is that he was already cued into the Satanic-Ritual aspect of the Susan Polk case and Daniel Horowitz's connection to both case. Problem is, the real story there is that Felix Polk conjured up fake satanic ritual sexual abuse against his own son and then used it to promote himself in the therapeutic/counseling profession by making presentations on it. I don't know about others, but I find Jewett and Kouri creepy and I do not want to see thise kind of this going on with those connected to law enforcement and prosecution.


SUMMATION

There were scratches/superficial incisions on Vitale's back that Jewett claimed were carvings by a knife and that Scott Dyleski was so weird he left them as his 'signature' or calling card on her back.  A bit odd that a prosecutor trying a 17 year old had to twist the facts and the imagery presented in court so far just to demonize a suspect with hopes of convicting him triumphing over justice and a fair trial.

The sad fact is that this is but one piece of evidence that was presented this way in court and went basically unchallenged. It simply does not make sense, yet Jewett's intial drawing in RED placed next to Dyleski's little man picture/signature became yet another meme promoted in the media. Same as the meme about the black trenchcoat, about calling a ski mask a balaclava (how many of you would ever use this word or have even heard of it?), same as calling Scott Dyleski a Satanist and same as claiming Scott initiated some conversation related to bludgeoning Vitale.



Protest against Harold Hal Jewett prosecuting a 6 year old for murder

MORE ABOUT PROSECUTOR HAL JEWETT: Hal Jewett is the same prosecutor who wanted to try a 6 year old as an adult and charge him with attempted murder. The child's lawyer, John Burris said he was shocked at what he saw as Jewett's attempts to demonize a child. Burris said..


"I was embarrassed for him [Jewett] as an adult human being''


ARTICLE LINK
Sticking to His Guns: Deputy D.A. Who Tries Cases of Juveniles, Charlie Goodyear, San Francisco Chronicle, July 21, 1998)



A Concerned Citizen Writes to Hal Jewett

"In October 2006, after the Scott Dyleski trial, I wrote, as a concerned citizen, two letters to Deputy District Attorney Harold Jewett, the prosecuting attorney in the Dyleski trial. I let him know that even though I didn't know any of the people involved, I was disturbed and concerned about what I believed to be the unfairness of Scott's trial.

I read every article a
nd watched every TV news item about the case, as well as having read the transcript from the preliminary hearing.

There were discrepancies and inconsistencies that were obvious to me, yet were never addressed to or by the jurors or by Scott's public defender, Ellen Leonida. Mr. Jewett readily answered both of my lette
rs, and tried in both to convince me of Scott's guilt. In the letters, he used the same manipulative techniques he had used on the jury to distort and twist the truth, and when he had no real evidence or facts, he speculated and guessed in a way that sounded like the truth. In so doing, he had managed to convince a jury of Scott's guilt, but not me."
16 October 2006






RELATED READING

The Satanic Cult Scare and Allegations of Ritual Child Abuse by Jeffrey S. Victor


Richardson, J. T. (1991). Satanism in the courts: From murder heavy metal. In J. Richardson, J. Best, & D. Bromley (Eds.).  The Satanism Scare (Hardcover)(Paperback) (pp. 205-217). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

Richardson, J., Best, J., & Bromley, D. (Eds.) (1991). The Satanism Scare (Hardcover)(Paperback). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

Schoeneman, T. J. (1975). The witch hunt as a culture change phenomenon. Ethos, 3(4), 529-554.

Shaw, D. (1990, January 19). Where was skepticism in media? Los Angeles Times, pp. A1, A20-A21.

Shaw, D. (1990, January 20). Reporter's early exclusiveness triggered a media frenzy. Los Angeles Times.

Victor, J. S. (1990). Satanic cult rumors as contemporary legend. Special Issue: "Contemporary Legends in Emergence."  Western Folklore, 49(1), 51-81.

Waterhouse, R. (1990, September 23). The making of a satanic myth.  The Independent.























© eosceres art & chris lawrence 2002-2007